Right then.... a reminder to those who were there at the end and a vivid description for those who were not... As people were packing up, this is roughly what happened...
[full references are down there on the left. Please email if you can't get hold of the papers]
I suggested that we really should have a proper look at Laurel Richardson's paper next time we meet... The end is particularly good, especially if we want to take up this 'writing group' idea... I'm hoping to read a bit more about writing groups before we meet... Anyone been in one..? Tell us more, here and/or there... Please, if you read just one thing, make it this...
Heather also recommended a paper by Carolyn Ellis that she really liked. So that's listed too.
And following on from the discussion about the afterlives of our work, who reads what so what can/should we say about whom, aaargh - an old chestnut - I've added a third paper, by Roger Sanjek, in which he describes his attempts to shape readings of his (1998) ethnography The future of us all: race and politics in New York City.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment